On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 05:10:55PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Pasi Kärkkäinen <pa...@iki.fi> writes: > > > On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 11:02:51AM +1100, Brian May wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 06:12:28PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > >> > If we're talking about Linux 2.6.32 support for pv_ops dom0 here, then > >> > that's > >> > in progress, see: > >> > > >> > http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2009-12/msg01127.html > >> > > >> > the 2.6.32 tree should be available shortly after Jeremy gets back from > >> > his vacation. > >> > >> What chance does this have of making it in time for Squeeze? > >> > > > > When actually is 'in time' for Squeeze? > > > > Novell already has the oldstyle xenlinux patches for 2.6.32, so they > > could be used, if pv_ops dom0 patches weren't in shape for Squeeze. > > > > -- Pasi > > Given that the pv_ops dom0 is still unstable: > > Where are the oldstyle patches for 2.6.32? >
Various Xen dom0 kernel options listed here: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenDom0Kernels Links to the OpenSUSE kernels (including Xen patches): http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Kernel:/HEAD/openSUSE_Factory/ ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/kernel/kotd/master/ http://www.gitorious.org/opensuse/kernel-source I'll ask Andrew Lyon if he has plans to release more easy-to-use patches against vanilla kernel.org 2.6.32. -- Pasi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
