Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@ieee.org> writes: > On Tue, Dec 29 2009, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I think the way forward for Git-maintained packages is the 3.0 (git) >> format, but changed to ship a bundle. That way, relevant branches and >> history can be included, and Git is fairly space-efficient so the >> additional cost of doing so isn't that bad. > As far as I can tell, git-bundle is not submodule friendly. I > would appreciate 3.0 (git) supporting submodules; and I'd be willing to > write code for that (once I am done relocating, that is) I think a bundle corresponds to a module, roughly, yes? If so, then one could presumably write some light infrastructure around multiple bundles to recreate a source tree with submodules. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
