Hi, On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 04:40:50PM +0100, Reinier Haasjes wrote: > I'm trying to solve bug #561324 which uses it's own binary in the config > script. > > It uses it's own binary to get some information (tunnel id) which uses > login+password to retrieve, it really needs this to compile a good > config script (if you have more than 1 tunnel).
Isn't it possible to create a configuration that receives this information on run? > My idea on solving this is to move the complete config script to > postinst and ask all the question there. Why? Is it really required to have _all_ questions in the postinst? > I read everywhere that this is not the preferred way to go but I can't > discover if it is prohibited by the policy. Uhm? Not that hard. 3.9.1 in the policy says: "Any necessary prompting should almost always be confined to the config or postinst script. If it is done in the postinst, it should be protected with a conditional so that unnecessary prompting doesn't happen if a package's installation fails and the postinst is called with abort-upgrade, abort-remove or abort-deconfigure." Best Regards, Patrick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org