On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 10:17, Ben Finney <ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au> wrote: > Sandro Tosi <mo...@debian.org> writes: > >> This (and other) rant are a signal we should create a TEAM around any >> fundamental packages in Debian, and python MUST NOT be and exception. >> >> Am I the only one (together with Angus, I'd say) believing python >> deserves a better maintainership than the one it currently has? > > You are not alone. What, specifically, are you proposing should be done;
to form a team to maintain python core packages (there is already a team on alioth, pkg-python, I think created for this purpose; it currently doesn't have any content in it) > and what is it that has prevented it being done already? That, without a formal ack from the maintainer, it would be an hijack; and it's not we didn't ask for collaborative maintainership of python. If instead the decision is made distribution-wide, it's a different topic, and probably we can come out with something from this thread. -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
