Mike Hommey wrote: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 10:12:07AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> The fact that Iceweasel does not behave like Firefox in some important >> areas has been bothering me more and more of late. Iceweasel breaks >> many, many web apps by virtue of not using the Firefox user-agent >> string. It also breaks compatibility with some plugins. > > I just decided I don't care anymore. So here is a deal to those reading > this thread. Give me a UA string that: > - Doesn't claim to be Firefox (i.e keep Iceweasel in it)
Would it meet your requirements if it said something like "Linux; Debian-Iceweasel" down deep in it somewhere? We could keep Firefox where people expect it, and add Iceweasel deep in it? > - Is compatible with most crappy sites on earth[1] (i.e. Test it. A lot) I would be happy to test with all the crappy sites I know if :-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
