Frank Lin PIAT dijo [Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 11:47:52PM +0100]: > Exemple 2: > > File: foo.c > > License: GPL-2 > > Binary-Package: foo > > > > File: doc/info/* > > License: GFDL-NON-FREE > > Binary-Package: foo-doc-is-non-free > The source package produces both a free and non-free package. > > This extra header would be completely optional, and only useful to > white-list some specific situation. > > That's just an idea (a foolish idea?)
Leaving aside what Ben Finney and Robert Collins also replied to your message... I do not believe this to be doable at all. Packages in main should have their source packages in main. But if the source package has non-free components, then it cannot be uploaded into main. Even if the non-free components are not packaged, in order to be in main they need to be stripped out of said components (and, say, repackaged with +dfsg version) Of course, you could perfectly have source packages in main generating binary packages both in main and in contrib - But the licenses for the sources' components would all be GFDL-free anyway. -- Gunnar Wolf • gw...@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
