On 02/11/09 at 12:12 +0000, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2009-11-02, Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net> wrote: > > > >> Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. > >> The > >> important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of > >> GNU > >> binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when > >> building > >> your executables. > > > > Since this obviously breaks lots of packages, what about changing the > > default in binutils-gold instead? > > Binutils-gold is not the default. It is a bit 'stricter' in how it > works, but it is notably faster.
I was talking about not making --no-add-needed the default in binutils-gold. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
