On Mon, Oct 05 2009, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Is the Packages.gz file then in violation of my packages license? It > doesn't come with a copy of the GPL as required by my software. :) In a narrow sense, this is also an argument you may make about any .deb whose license belongs in /usr/share/common-licenses; since the binary .deb does not contain the licenses required. If the end user uses alien to install it on, say, a fedora machine, the pointers to the license file would be left dangling. In a number of ways, individual bits of our OS are not distributable in isolation. manoj -- We have a equal opportunity Calculus class -- it's fully integrated. Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org