George Danchev <danc...@spnet.net> writes: > Okay, that sounds reasonable, provided all non-user-defined fields are > standard, or otherwise illegal. Another standard field (i.e. non-X[BSC] > ) I found is `Bugs'; seems they are hinting someone or something like > BTS or LP, though I'm not exactly sure if it is good candidate for reuse > [1]. I also sorted packages on per field basis [2] (most interesting > fields, not all).
Bugs is sort of an interesting case since there's no reason to ever include it in a Debian package, but it's part of the package format and people making packages for non-Debian distributions should be aware of it. reportbug honors it when directing bugs to a different BTS. I wouldn't mind seeing it in Policy, although of course Debian packages shouldn't use it since we want to use our BTS for everything and that's the default. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
