On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 13:32:54 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > 2. Naming scheme > > The package should be named gir1.0-foo-X.Y. For example, the package > containing WebKit-1.0.gir will be named gir1.0-webkit-1.0. > > Giant repositories of dozens of unrelated introspection data should be > avoided. (Under this rationale, gobject-introspection-repository will be > split.) However, related libraries that are known to evolve together can > live in the same package (example: Gst*-0.10). > > If, alternatively, the introspection data belongs in the same source > package as the library it references, it can be put in the same binary > package. In this case, it must feature a Provides: field corresponding > to the name of the introspection data. For example, libfoo2.0-2 > containing libfoo-2.0.so.2 and Foo-2.0.gir must provide gir1.0-foo-2.0. > Doesn't this break co-installability of libfoo2.0-X and libfoo2.0-Y, if both install Foo-2.0.gir?
Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
