On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:56:07 +0000 (UTC), Philipp Kern <tr...@philkern.de> wrote: >On 2009-09-18, Tom Feiner <feiner....@gmail.com> wrote: >> Looks like this method works well for clamav-data and other similar packages >> which needs to update databases frequently on stable/oldstable. > >clamav-data is scheduled for deletion as soon as volatile moves onto >ftp-master, so that's no precedent. (I.e. there is opposition against >daily builds entering the archive without real developers signing them.)
Why does the person responsible for these uploads not know about this opposition? Why was the person doing the significant work not informed about the fact that every single minute put into the package is wasted anyway? I wasn't informed once about the changes that were applied to the volatile mechanisms in the last year. All interruptions in the clamav-data delivery were caused by unannounced changes. Does the project want me to stop providing clamav-data starting tomorrow? Greetings Marc -- -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! ----- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/ Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
