[ brief response, I hope to respond in more detail to much of this thread soon ]
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 08:54:05AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > I think that DEP 5 still needs some work, so I hope that > you will not be too annoyed if some changes during the > discussions on the draft will break your parser from time > to time. Not at all, it is to be expected. Actually I am going to experiment to see whether the parser can fit into an Appendix, or whether it would be too unwieldy. (and I would ultimately like to write a test suite, in the style of feedvalidator.org etc., which would clearly not fit into the text). > As you noted, one of the things to change is the syntax of > the Files field. It actually has been debated in length in > a previous thread this year > Steve and I disagree on how to use the DEP Subversion > repository Thank you for the references and background: I think it's time I explored the prior discussion on DEP-5 in more depth. -- Jon Dowland
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
