On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 07:48:18PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 08:50:34AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > Seems to me that we have a widely used convention (which might > > not be universal) that will meet our needs, and at least seems > > compatible with a lot of software under distributed version control. I > > think it well behooves us to re-use this, rather than go off an > > reinvent the wheel ourselves and be incompatible with _everything_ else > > out there. > > FWIW, for having discussed it with Raphael on #-qa, he seems pretty much > convinced my proposal to make DEP3 compatible with git-format-patch is > going in the good direction. > > He's annoyed I sent that mail so late (and FWIW sorry but I hadn't the > time to do it before, and when I had time in august I hadn't > connectivity.. but whatever) but I think the proposal will be amended so > that we're compatible.
Interestingly, using git format-patch format had been suggested back in june and july, with more opposition... Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
