Hi,
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 06:21:33PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Right. I did not copy the upstream. I also think that we have
> invested a lot of effort in Debian in order to make Squeeze SELinux
> compliant, and make it so that turning on SELinux is fairly easy. I
> have asked the release managers to consider making Squeeze have SELinux
> working out of the box a release goal, and so far there has been no
> denial; and I consider the patch consistent with the choices we have
> made as a project in the past.
>
> I am also saying that I would be willing to maintain the SELinux
> patches in sysvinit/upstart, if it comes to that, and the "burden" of
> keeping the patch around would be fairly small (it is a small patch,
> and fairly self contained).
The original announcement said that Fedora is already using upstart.
AFAIK Fedora is also commited to using SELinux. Do they use a similar
patch? Can they help convincing upstream?
Gabor
--
---------------------------------------------------------
MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
---------------------------------------------------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
