On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:28:30AM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote: > Hi, > > Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > The only difference with the unstable version is that libc-bin and > > libc-dev-bin are splitted out of libc6 and libc6-dev. This way it > > complies with the Debian Policy requirement that the libraries should > > not contain binaries, which is also a requirement for multiarch. > > I just tried to upgrade libc6 with experimental. The upgrade has been > smooth but libc-dev-bin has not been pulled in (whereas libc6-dev has been > upgraded). Is it the expected behavior ? >
Thanks for noticing that. It's not normal that libc-dev-bin is not pulled, but if you look at the dependencies it actually normal. I'll try to understand why the dependency is declared in the debian/control file, but does not appear is in the final binary. Stay tuned. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 [email protected] http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
