On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 13:24:48 -0300 Tiago Bortoletto Vaz <ti...@debian-ba.org> wrote:
> #531002 made me bring this to -devel. It seems Debian BTS fails in > #not offering > an 'invalid' or 'notabug' tag for cases which are not covered by > 'wontfix' [0]. I've found the following discussions about this issue: Just put a comment in the message to $number-d...@bugs.debian.org that you're closing the bug as invalid. Closing doesn't mean that the bug has been accepted as valid. (That can be done with confirmed.) > For me it doesn't make sense to mark something as "I will not fix" if > actually there's nothing to fix. I'm curious to know how other > maintainers have addressed such cases in BTS. Nothing to fix? close the bug. I don't see we need two different ways to close a bug. Invalid would still close the bug. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgp5ODKOM1qrI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
