On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 12:28:59PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 07:03:40PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > And after all, debhelper didn't need a DEP at all in order to come into > > widespread use, so your worst case scenario could equally well come to pass > > without ever going through a public discussion process - there are already a > > fair number of formatted debian/copyright files in the wild based on nothing > > more than a pretty bad wiki draft... > > It feels like half the problem here is that making it a DEP feels much > more like something that's being pushed to everyone. If it were going > through a similar process to debhelper people would probably feel more > comfortable about ignoring it.
You're a Debian Developer - you have the right to ignore about everything except release critical bugs in your packages. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
