su, 2009-06-07 kello 20:07 -0700, Steve Langasek kirjoitti:
> In other words, the real question is: which of these is easier for your
> hypothetical user to read?:
>
> space-separated
> Files: a\ b c d\ e\ f g.*
>
> comma-separated
> Files: a\,b, c, d\,e\,f, g.*
url-encoded:
Files: a%2Cb c d%2Ce%2Cf g.*
Files: a%20b c d%20e%20f g.*
> For my part I'm actually inclined to say that the latter is more readable,
> but let's get the rationale right. :)
I rather think they're all unreadable. URL encoding at least makes it
easy to see each pattern separately from the others.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
