On Thu, 04 Jun 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > If it is not a bug in the package (in other words, no change made > in the package would fix the issue), I see no point in keeping it > open. It would be nice, however, is a psuedo-package were created > for the buildds (or one per buildd, though that seems excessive) so > such issues can be tracked in a central location, rather than > scattered across the 9000 or so source packages.
There is a buildd.debian.org psuedopackage.[1] [The buildd maintainers could arange to separate their bug list based on which buildd or arch was affected by the use of usertags and usercategories; if there are questions about that, contact ow...@b.d.o for assistance.] Don Armstrong 1: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=buildd.debian.org -- He no longer wished to be dead. At the same time, it cannot be said that he was glad to be alive. But at least he did not resent it. He was alive, and the stubbornness of this fact had little by little begun to fascinate him -- as if he had managed to outlive himself, as if he were somehow living a posthumous life. -- Paul Auster _City of Glass_ http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
