* Josselin Mouette <[email protected]> [2009-06-02 10:53]: > Le lundi 01 juin 2009 à 16:26 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit : > > > What has the initramfs got to do with this? > > > > For / to be on LVM you need an initramfs. / on raid (with custom > > kernel) or plain partition works without one. > > I already know that, thanks, but it still doesn’t make your point. Just > because you have some religious taboo against initramfs doesn’t make it > an invalid solution.
Still that doesn't mean that the project should depricate support for a separate /usr for the sake of udev. If some want to use an initramfs less kernel let them have a functional system, same goes for those that prefere a udev less system. 2 cents Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
