On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:13:43AM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On Wednesday 13 May 2009 21:55:00 Guillem Jover wrote: > > So, there's missing support in sbuild (#501230), which arguably is > > a pretty recent bug report, but AFAIR I sent a mail to Ryan long time > > ago when drafting the wildcard support and never heard back, but then > > I never insisted again, so that's on me. > > > > Then the buildd network will need to be upgraded to use an sbuild > > supporting that. I'm not sure if wanna-build might also need changes. > > Lintian will need to be fixed as well once the buildd network supports > > this. And then minor stuff like the vim debcontrol syntax highlighter > > and similar.
> Would it be reasonable/acceptable to establish this issue as a squeeze > release > goal? a release goal is IMHO something that needs fixes in a sweep of packages in archive before release. This change OTOH just needs fixes to sbuild and then some infrastructure work (deploying new sbuild/buildd everywhere). As the second part is already being worked on, all you need is to provide patches to the sbuild/buildd maintainers :)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
