Bjørn Mork <[email protected]> writes:

> I don't know, but there are plenty of reasons to choose from.  See e.g.
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

A stronger, and simpler, case is made by
<URL:http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful/> which
notes that the newer IETF standards make it much clearer that the
Reply-To field is specifically for the message sender to create.

-- 
 \        “My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. |
  `\               Unless there are three other people.” —Orson Welles |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to