Neil Williams <codeh...@debian.org> writes: > Because it's a useless waste of time to make a spurious distinction > where none needs to exist.
We seem to largely be talking past each other. > Unless the files are under different licences, there is no reason to > subdivide the copyright statements. This, though, seems to me to be a very concise and accurate summary of your position. Correct? If that's the case, then I can't see why you would bother collecting copyright statements *at all*; the file ‘debian/copyright’ is essentially a misnomer, and it should contain nothing but license grants and terms. Please show me where I've misunderstood your position. -- \ “I just got out of the hospital; I was in a speed-reading | `\ accident. I hit a bookmark and flew across the room.” —Steven | _o__) Wright | Ben Finney
pgp3nPVrVdCMu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
