I demand that Frans Pop may or may not have written... > Darren Salt wrote: >> I demand that Manoj Srivastava may or may not have written... >>> On Wed, Apr 01 2009, Frans Pop wrote: >>>> But is anyone still using it? Is there any current reason to support it >>> I think that there are Debian users who use that option of make-kpkg, >>> and I have not seen any indication that there usage of that option has >>> decreased. >> I make use of it fairly regularly; its next use here will probably be to >> build kernel 2.6.29.1. I normally use the kernel-image target, but I >> sometimes have use for the kernel-headers target.
> The question was not whether you use make-kpkg, but whether any of the hook > scripts you may have in /etc/kernel/*.d/ rely on the second parameter that > is passed by the postinst included with the kernel image by make-kpkg. I've not touched anything there; I've not needed to so far. Also, /etc/kernel doesn't exist here. -- | Darren Salt | linux or ds at | nr. Ashington, | Toon | RISC OS, Linux | youmustbejoking,demon,co,uk | Northumberland | Army | + Generate power using sun, wind, water, nuclear. FORGET COAL AND OIL. You will outgrow your usefulness. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
