2009/3/26 Tzafrir Cohen <tzaf...@cohens.org.il> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 03:08:07PM +0100, Cassiel wrote: > > > When talking about RT kernel only one patch comes into play -->> > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/ > > That's a huge patch. > > Any idea how much effort would it take to integrae it into the existing > Debian linux-2.6 package?
I really can not figure out. I am a statistician with web developing and database skills and not a C programmer, I can help in testing and building debian packages, assuming someone else takes care of integrating the patch... > > > other references regarding kernel config are found in -->> > > http://www.alsa-project.org/main/index.php/Low_latency_howto > > Seems a bit dated. E.g. HPET is now enabled by default in Lenny. Yes it is, but I found it useful as a starting point, fundamental steps are all there. > > > > IMHO, the upstream kernel version should follow the RT patch releases. > > > > Benchmarks can be easily provided by users if encouraged to use the same > > toolbox, eg.-->> > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tglx/rt-tests.git;a=summary > > Actually I have none but as I introduced in the previous post recording > one > > more track on my i386 PentiumIV dual core running Ardour with 14-16 > tracks + > > fx + software monitoring (i.e. ardour) is possible running RT kernels, > > running stock kernels results in too many xruns. > r
