Michael Meskes wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 04:24:59PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> Mike O'Connor <s...@debian.org> (25/03/2009): >>> Yes, there have definately been times when packages are rejected from >>> NEW that only got there becuase of a package addition. I'd say its >> ... >> And while the new package is kept out, the package currently in the >> archive might not be suitable at all. In the case of a single binary > > Or the package staying in the archive might even have a security problem. Yes, > even that happened.
Well, it's a bad sign that people are mixing the fixing of RC/security bugs with new (binary) packages unless the bugs cannot be fixed without them (which usually is *not* the case). Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
