On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 08:55:34AM -0800, Paul Menage wrote: > On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 6:38 AM, Gustavo Noronha <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 23:44 +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > >> I agree with all that Thadeu Lima says here. I would add that cgroups > >> are nothing to do with device nodes, so definitely don't belong in > >> '/dev/' either. > >> > >> Since they're a filesystem mapping "for browsing and manipulation > >> from user space" of a kernel facility, I think '/sys/cgroups/' is > >> appropriate. > > > > I agree with this point of view. I believe /sys/cgroups is the way to > > go. Now, of course this has the drawback of shadowing something future > > versions of Linux would make available at that same path, but I am > > pretty sure they would be careful not to do that after distributions > > have settled on a standard path. > > Having one virtual filesystem mounted on top of another virtual > filesystem seems like a recipe for problems.
Like with /sys/fs/fuse/connections ? Come on, there is no problem with a virtual filesystem mounted on top of another. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
