On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:29, Sandro Tosi <mo...@debian.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 10:52, Don Armstrong <d...@debian.org> wrote: >> Actually, if you're interested in maintaining it, I'd be happy to see >> it deployed on the master BTS server. I suppose it can live on merkel >> for the time being until you're ready to migrate it, but having it >> under the debbugs umbrella would be good. [Not that I'd be actually >> touching it much, because my python-fu[1] is almost non-existant.] > > For me makes little difference: I see it more as a QA "thingy" but I > have no problem in deploying on other servers.
I changed my mind, and I'd like to kindly accept your offer. As of know, I'm testing it on merkel, just to have it deployed on a Debian box. The important thing (i'm aware up to know) is that the targetted machine has: - structure /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/db-h/ as merkel (but since it's bugs-mirror, I think on bugs.d.o I'll find the same layout) - mta (for DSA joy :) but I think bugs.d.o has one for sure). The current tests are run by hand, just to catch all those corner cases/situations we'd like to handle. Don, if you're ok, I think the current git repo and alioth mls can be kept even in future; maybe a pseudo-package (as MadCoder suggested) can be helpful to track feat-requests/bugs notifications. Other ideas will be expressed as soon as they'll come :) Cheers, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
