Sune Vuorela <nos...@vuorela.dk> writes: > On 2009-01-02, Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> wrote:
>> I'm honestly mystified as to why any of the following should be in >> standard, given how obscure what they do seems to be: >>> consolekit >>> libpam-ck-connector > Consolekit will be more and more used, at least for desktop installs in > squeeze, they will probably be impossible to avoid. I'm not sure what you mean by "desktop installs" and therefore don't understand what consolekit would do that makes it standard. If you mean desktop systems such as GNOME or KDE, they're not in standard and would never be by the definition of standard (standard does not include X), so if they're what use consolekit, that's not an argument for making it standard. However, it may be a good argument for why it's not obscure. I did check a current unstable GNOME system and saw no sign of consolekit, but that may not mean anything. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
