On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:24:13 -0500 Barry deFreese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Neil Williams wrote: > > <snip> > > Barry - PLEASE do not continue with the request for sponsorship of > > gtkglarea. > > > > <snip> > Neil, > > My apologies but I just uploaded it. It still has a few r(b)depends: .... and will still be removed if libgtk1.2 is finally removed. The list of reverse dependencies make no difference - those depend on libgtk1.2 and would need to either migrate or be removed. Not sponsoring the upload was a chance to further the goal of removing gtk1.2 - it was an opportunity that has now been missed. The objective remains the same. > Sorry, > > Barry deFreese Has my response changed your opinion of gtkglarea in Debian? You could always join the calls for packages depending on gtkglarea to migrate to libgtkgl2.0 and thereby support the removal of gtk1.2 and glib1. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgpL6OsR4M7eP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
