Hi, On Tuesday 02 December 2008 23:09, Frans Pop wrote: > As there is no security support for backports I do not feel comfortable > adding this
I'm sure people with said hardware would appreciate a working system with no
security support over having a unusable machine :)
And, as Martin said, bpo has security support now.
> project-etchnahalf AT teams.debian.net
> Not sure if anybody still really follows that list though (I have never
> been subscribed to it...).
I do :) And from the replies I got, I know others do.
regards,
Holger
pgpGQ0Vksidxe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
