Andreas, On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > >>> Let see if the community has any interest in this package. There are a >>> couple of gray areas remaining: >>> >>> - should I keep the version number 62 (aka 6b) from IJG or will this >>> confuse people ? > > The version number should be different from the other libjpeg inside > Debian.
Just to double check you understand that I call the package "libljpeg" so that it does not conflict with "libjpeg". The reason I kep the 62 notation is so that people are aware the patch was applied against the official ijg release 62, and not the one from guido's 6c release. >>> - I have a couple of patch in the gdcm/jpeg that have not been >>> applied. It concern broken JPEG implementation and have not been seen >>> outside of the DICOM world. > > I have no idea in how far these patches make sense for general use outside > Debian - than they should be included into the tarball (under a new version, > because it is just a new upstream version). If they only are useful for > specific Debian package they should be applied using quilt or dpatch. So far the package is very minimalist and only contains : - ijg 6b - lossless patch - cmakelists it does not contains non of the gdcm's patch. I'll work on that; once I see positive response from a DD to handle the package. This duplicate my work from the gdcm package, so I'd prefer not waste my time for a doomed package. >> I forgot to mention, the debian/* files are not shipped with the >> tarball and can be found instead at: >> >> http://jpeg.svn.sf.net/viewvc/jpeg/ljpeg/debian/ > > This is really great. I think I just elaborated about debian files in > upstream tarball - thanks for this sane decision. > > Any volunteers to build an official Debian package from it to proceed > with the dicom issues? > > Kind regards and thanks for your fine work As a side note what does it takes to becomes a DD ? I guess there should be some info on the web, I'll check on that. Regards, -- Mathieu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]