On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 03:47:56PM +0000, Robert Lemmen wrote: > if i understand things correctly than option 2 is what we are trying to > do with the kernel in the moment (correct me if i am wrong), and the > only thing i am saying is that having a package A which will not work > (in some cases) without package B should declare some kind of > relationship on it. simply because there *is* a relation between them...
That "sort of relationship" between a package A that possibly (i.e. "in some cases") might use a package B is AFAIK called "suggests" which would be just fine: it declares a relationship and it is allowed to declare it between packages in main and non-free. Hauke
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
