On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 11:00 +0300, Teemu Likonen wrote: > Ben Finney (2008-10-21 17:37 +1100): > > > That's not the point being made: As I understand Manoj's point, it is > > that tagging a bug ‘lenny-ignore’ is an active decision that a > > particular bug, even if it represents a DFSG violation, will not be > > considered in the decision to release. > > > > To that extent, it *is* making the decision that it is acceptable to > > release Debian with DFSG-violating works, in advance of the decision > > to actually release. > > OK guys, please. As a random Debian user may I suggest that you stop > investigating _who_ is violating DFSG and instead focus on _what_ things > are the cause of violating DFSG.
Already done. > I guess we know about the "what" part > already and that part exists in Sid too. So I think you should do > > apt-get source linux-2.6 > > and go fix the issues you are concerned about - or help testing the > fixes provided by others (I might do some testing too). And perhaps the > users whose hardware won't be supported anymore appreciate some help on > how to work around their problem. (It looks like this includes me.) I just wrote this: http://womble.decadent.org.uk/blog/for-those-who-care-about-firmware.html Ben.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
