On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 03:44:47PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > It has been already suggested to resurrect the non-us archive for such > cases, but this is not even necessary, since it is not a problem for us > to distribute such software from the US. > > At the very least, we could distribute them in a specific "patented" > section, with rules similar to non-free, and that we’d only mirror in > countries where it is not a problem.
While we are at it, would be nice to have a section for DMCA-impaired software such as libdvdcss. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
