On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 18:10 +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 06:02:17PM +0200, Franklin PIAT wrote: > > The page could have an "Expert" subpage (or let's name it kamikaze, so > > people don't get impressed by the name ;) > > Frankly, I'm not sure why to have distributions in there at all.
I've further rephrased to something like "system running DebianTesting falls in this category" > Clearly, SELinux issues etc. in stable won't get fixed anymore. <offtopic> That's where wiki pages can be useful (a kind of "Knowledge base"). </offtopic> > Giving people advice on how to test stuff on testing makes sense > to me, but we can safely assume unstable users would be able to > use those hints transparently. If we say something in Unstable section, it is implicitly unsuitable for Testing... > In the end, enabling SELinux on testing or unstable is probably roughly > the same risk, and overloading that page with major advice for running > testing and/or unstable and their trade-offs looks like diluting the > message to me. ... and the sections now starts with "Same as above". BTW, I have re-introduced a "DD Development System", which could/should list Squeeze release-goals candidates that needs testing. Franklin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
