On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 06:05:20PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Michael Banck a écrit : > > On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 05:49:04AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > >> There is a bug upstream, but marked as invalid: > >> > >> http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4980 > >> > >> According to the upstream developer, there is a rationale for that, but > >> he never explained it, despite having been asked numerous times. > > > > In his latest reply, the upstream developer said that code got rewritten > > since, I have not checked their repository though. > > I have just built a version from CVS, and I confirm the bug is fixed. > However I failed to find the commit(s) which fixed it, and anyway I > doubt it's a single commit. Therefore I don't think we can backport the > fix for lenny. > > We can try to use the proposed 2.7 patch instead.
Please open a bug report with severity (at least) important if you consider we should fix this bug for lenny. If not, the problem will be fixed when we switch to glibc 2.9. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
