On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 11:47:28AM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote: > Looking at the description (http://edos.debian.net/missing-conflicts/doc.html) > I'm not sure weather these tests take into account upgrades. > > So, just for my information, does edos do that ?
Indeed they don't. Actually that tests are only meant to detect "statically" missing file Conflicts, while the kind of file overwrite problems which are spotted during package upgrades are more dynamic and depends on the order in which packages upgraded. Even though there is a logic followed by apt/dpkg in deciding the order in which perform package upgrades, that logics is currently not formalized and hence not used by the current EDOS/Mancoosi tools. A bit more information about the file overwrite checks, in addition to those available in the link you posted above, are available in the paper accompanying the Mancoosi talk at DebConf8. A .pdf of that is available at http://upsilon.cc/~zack/research/publications/debconf8-mancoosi.pdf, and also as an attachment to the event in Pentabarf (but I'm not sure if the latter is publicly available). Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 [EMAIL PROTECTED],pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ I'm still an SGML person,this newfangled /\ All one has to do is hit the XML stuff is so ... simplistic -- Manoj \/ right keys at the right time
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
