On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:44:53AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:23:19AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:08:43AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 01:04:45AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > > > right but still no excuse to bring in a patch set that is *known* > > > > to not be merged upstream. > > > So OpenVZ is also out of reach. > > openvz is actively working on namespace merge and using the emerging > > bits. their patchsize is decreasing. > > Which does not change the fact that the patch in this form will never be > accepted.
sure patchsets of such size are never gobed in *one* step. here you'll find a nice metric on their merge success: http://community.livejournal.com/openvz/22369.html -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
