Hi there! On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:24:47 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Andreas Tille wrote: >> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Sandro Tosi wrote: >>> in the binary section of hunchentoot, I think you have to add >>> >>> Replaces: cl-hunchentoot >>> Conflicts: cl-hunchentoot >> >> If you want to provide a transitional binary package cl-hunchentoot >> which depends on hunchentoot you can't use this conflicts. > > That's why we use versioned Conflicts on the version that are > non-empty.
Since I want to support smooth upgrades, I need to do the following:
Package: hunchentoot
Version: 2.0
Provides: cl-hunchentoot [1]
Replace: cl-hunchentoot (<< 2.0)
Conflicts: cl-hunchentoot (<< 2.0)
Package: cl-hunchentoot
Depends: hunchentoot
Am I correct?
Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca
Footnotes:
[1] not strictly useful since `apt-cache rdepends cl-hunchentoot`
returns no packages, but I think I'll add it anyway
pgpaWdh7tAt2v.pgp
Description: PGP signature
