On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 09:31:22AM +0000, Mike Bird wrote: > On Wed June 4 2008 00:59:15 Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > a broken software, or an inadequate one is more a problem to > > me than not having it in Debian. Debian is about quality, not > > quantity. > > (1) Pierre thus asserts IMPERFECT PACKAGE < MISSING PACKAGE.
For testing yes. > (2) To a user who wishes to use a working feature of an imperfect > package, Debian is better with the imperfect package than > without: MISSING PACKAGE < IMPERFECT PACKAGE < PERFECT PACKAGE. > This is true even if the imperfect package has an avoidable > publicized security bug. This user should use unstable. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgpNrtrQTeHvU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
