Ben Finney wrote: > Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> We don't enforce it anyway, and all this provision seems to do in >> practice is create these annoying arguments periodically. > > No, that's not all it does. It also has the significant effect that > discussions in these forums do not, in the main, generate needless > individual copies of messages in the participants's mailboxes. I, and > presumably the people who drafted the code of conduct, continue to > find that a very favourable outcome of this provision.
Fully agreed. I'd hate to see this dropped from the CoC. Clint Adams sent a request to d-www to have the CoC changed and I have replied with a strong NACK to that suggestion. If the CoC should be changed, it should be done after a proper discussion (on d-project probably) and at least be done in coordination with the listmasters, not as the result of an individual request by a random DD. Cheers, FJP
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
