Please follow <URL:http://www.debian.org/MailingLists#codeofconduct> and avoid sending individual copies of messages also sent to the lists, since I haven't asked for that.
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 12:27:29PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > > Please change this to a package name that is less generic, and > > conforms with other OCaml library packages. 'libres-ocaml' would > > be better. > > This is the source package name, as in all ITPs, not the binary > package name. No OCaml package has a source name like libFOO-ocaml, > they all have *binaries* called libFOO-ocaml-dev. Regardless, 'res' is an overly general name. The package should be more specific to the fact that it's an OCaml library. The time to choose an appropriate name is now rather than later. -- \ “If sharing a thing in no way diminishes it, it is not | `\ rightly owned if it is not shared.” —Saint Augustine | _o__) | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
