On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:38:39 +0100, Darren Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I demand that Loïc Minier may or may not have written...
>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>>> But I disagree that debian/rules is necessarily the place where it
>>> belongs. It looks like cruft/bad design to have the same snippet of
>>> code in all packages.
>> Perhaps this should be fixed in another way then? For example a
>> shared Makefile included by all debian/rules (if they are a makefile
>> :) -- ala cdbs, but with a simple documented interface such as
>> documenting that this will set *FLAGS based on deb_build_opts. e.g.
>> /usr/share/dpkg/flags.mk with:
>> CFLAGS += -Wall -g -O$(if $(findstring noopt,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)),0,2)
> That looks reasonable to me.
Hmm. Smells a lot like:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
ifneq (,$(findstring noopt,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
CFLAGS += -O0
else
CFLAGS += -O2
endif
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
See §10.1. Binaries.
> However, care should be taken to avoid ending up with
> cdbs-buildpackage ;-)
manoj
--
"I'd love to go out with you, but I want to spend more time with my
blender."
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
