On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 07:54:46PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > Bas Wijnen wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:37:07AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > >> Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> We have other ways of tracking that information than the version, though. > > > > Yes, and I don't really care, I just think going from +s1+nmu1 to +s2 > > seems to be doing things that it doesn't (revert the NMU). > > Strange reasoning as 1.0-0.1 followed by 1.1 is also not reverting an > NMU perse...
Except that 1.1 is a MU unlike a security upload. One can expect that a decision was made about including (or not) the NMU in the next MU upload. -- James GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
