On Sun, 16 Mar 2008, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Sunday 16 March 2008 00:52, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > We're aware that the Developers Reference specifies that the latter > > format should be used, but it is problematic as -0.1 sorts before +b1 > > and, as such, the NMU will not supersede any previous binNMUs of the > > same package version. > > > > Whilst looking at this change, the question arose of what format > > security uploads of native packages should use, both in general and > > specifically when debchange's --security option is used. > > There may not be a good solution since MU's, NMU's and security uploads can > currently be interleaved in any particular order, so it seems hard to make a > scheme that would work reliably.
It's possible, you just have to put the increment number before the "type" of upload: - +c0.nmu (non maintainer upload) - +c1.sec (security upload) - +c2.su (stable update) Unfortunately "+0.nmu" sorts before "+b1" so I had to put "+c0.nmu" so that binnmu sort lower. And "c" could mean "change" or "external change". Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
