Hi Raphael,
On Fr, 22 Feb 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> You're speaking of something that you have not understood. The order
> of packages listed in an OR has not changed... I am (of course) aware
> that the order has a meaning in that case.
That is what could be easily understood of the previous email(s),
citing:
> > In some cases, particularly when the Depends can be satisfied by
> > different sets of alternatives, this change could have the effect of
> > changing the packages actually pulled in by apt-get or aptitude. I will
[...]
> I can understand it might change the list of packages pulled, but both set
> are supposed to work since that what dependencies are expressing. If you
there explicitely "alternatives" are mentioned.
Anyway, enough, ...
> "All is ok" as you say. :-)
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Vienna University of Technology
Debian Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian TeX Group
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A crash reduces
Your expensive computer
To a simple stone.
--- Windows Error Haiku
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
