On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 22:24:09 +0100, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 08:02:42PM +0000, Guillem Jover wrote: >> On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 10:54:11 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: >> > Of course, that would mean that the few debian/rules (hi Manoj) >> > in Debian not being makefiles [...] >> You were probably thinking about Josip (and now the VDR team): >> <http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tdebian-rules-not-a-makefile.html> > Damn, I was pretty sure Manoj still had some custom perl things, but > I stand corrected :) What do you mean, still? I have never used anything but make in my rules files; indeed, I was the one who has (over the objections of a few people) maintained that the policy of requiring Make files make sense. I do have Perl maintainer scripts, though. manoj -- A clever prophet makes sure of the event first. Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
