On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:53:00PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Did you followup with upstream on the SSP problems we've seen > on ARM?
Basicly their response was basicly "why would anyone want 5-10% bigger and slower binaries on arm". It was also discussed the possibility of --disable-ssp we use on our current arm/armel toolchain being broken. Once I have a bit more time I'll try seeing what happens if you build gcc-4.3 with ssp enabled. -- "rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
