On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:08:29AM +0100, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le vendredi 25 janvier 2008 à 09:50 +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit : > > > As a second runner up, quilt is ok by me. :) > > > > For historical reasons I use dpatch but I'm not really happy with this. > > I would gladly adopt any other patch system if it would be declared as > > kind of standard. > > I’d be glad if we could standardize on quilt. It is the only one to be > both simple and powerful, and I know very few people unhappy with it. > Other patch systems I have tried (dpatch, dbs and simple-patchsys) have > all serious flaws that end up hitting you on non-trivial packages.
The only sad thing is that quilt only deals with patches (i.e. diffs), whereas dpatch can do scripts, too. Anyways, I now prefer not using dpatch of quilt. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
